anti goat gal3 antibody Search Results


93
Santa Cruz Biotechnology anti gal 3
Anti Gal 3, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+goat+gal3+antibody/10__1158_slash_0008___5472__can___08___1117-87-22-25?v=Santa+Cruz+Biotechnology
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti gal 3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
R&D Systems anti goat gal3 antibody
Anti Goat Gal3 Antibody, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+goat+gal3+antibody/bio_rxiv__477927-280-26-30?v=R%26D+Systems
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti goat gal3 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
FUJIFILM rat anti-mouse gal-3
Immunohistochemical staining of <t>Gal-3</t> (red) expressing microglia. All microglia were detected using the microglia marker Iba1 (green). At 0 DIV no Gal-3-expressing cells were found (A, B). In controls, at 3, 4 and 7 DIV Iba1/Gal-3 co-expressing cells were found and only in the GCL (C, D, G, H, K, and L). LPS-treated retinas displayed larger numbers of Iba1/Gal-3 co-expressing cells that were located in the GCL, INL and OPL at 3, 4 and 7 DIV. Scale bar: 200 μm.
Rat Anti Mouse Gal 3, supplied by FUJIFILM, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+goat+gal3+antibody/pmc05017668-56-33-37?v=FUJIFILM
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rat anti-mouse gal-3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Santa Cruz Biotechnology resource source identifier antibodies rat monoclonal anti gal3
Figure 2. CNN2 translocates to damaged lysosomes and is ubiquitylated for timely dissociation (A) Dynamic association of endogenous CNN2 with damaged lysosomes in HeLa cells. Immunofluorescence of CNN2 and <t>Gal3</t> as lysosomal damage marker after mock or LLOMe treatment for indicated time periods. Note CNN2 translocation and dissociation before Gal3 clearance. (B) Graph represents the percentage of CNN2 and Gal3-positive vesicles among all Gal3-positive vesicles per cell. More than 30 cells were quantified per condition in each experiment (n = 4 biologically independent experiments). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s multiple comparison test, ** p = 0.0036, *** p = 0.0002, and **** p < 0.0001. Error bars represent the mean ± SEM. (C) Schematic domain structure of CNN2 with positions of identified ubiquitylation sites indicated. CH domain, calponin homology domain; ABS1/2, actin- binding sites. (D) HeLa cells expressing CNN2-GFP wild type or harboring lysine-to-arginine substitutions in the CH domain (CH-KR) following mock or LLOMe treatment as indicated. Note that CNN2 wild type dissociates from LAMP1 vesicles within 3 h, but the ubiquitylation mutants persist. See Figure S3A for CNN2-GFP 5xKR covering the 5 ubiquitylation sites detected by MS. (E) Quantification of (D). Percentage of LAMP1 vesicles positive for CNN2. More than 20 cells were quantified. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test, *** p = 0.0003 and **** p < 0.0001; ns, not significant. Error bars represent the mean ± SD. (F) Live-cell imaging of HeLa cells expressing CNN2-GFP CH-KR and mCherry-Gal3. Lysosomes were loaded with photosensitizer AIPcS2a, irradiated in the indicated area, and chased over the course of 1 h. See Figure S3E for wild type and CNN2 5xKR imaging data. (A, D, and F) Scale bars, 10 mm.
Resource Source Identifier Antibodies Rat Monoclonal Anti Gal3, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+goat+gal3+antibody/pm35793674-290-2-11?v=Santa+Cruz+Biotechnology
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
resource source identifier antibodies rat monoclonal anti gal3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
R&D Systems rabbit polyclonal anti gal 3
Figure 2. CNN2 translocates to damaged lysosomes and is ubiquitylated for timely dissociation (A) Dynamic association of endogenous CNN2 with damaged lysosomes in HeLa cells. Immunofluorescence of CNN2 and <t>Gal3</t> as lysosomal damage marker after mock or LLOMe treatment for indicated time periods. Note CNN2 translocation and dissociation before Gal3 clearance. (B) Graph represents the percentage of CNN2 and Gal3-positive vesicles among all Gal3-positive vesicles per cell. More than 30 cells were quantified per condition in each experiment (n = 4 biologically independent experiments). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s multiple comparison test, ** p = 0.0036, *** p = 0.0002, and **** p < 0.0001. Error bars represent the mean ± SEM. (C) Schematic domain structure of CNN2 with positions of identified ubiquitylation sites indicated. CH domain, calponin homology domain; ABS1/2, actin- binding sites. (D) HeLa cells expressing CNN2-GFP wild type or harboring lysine-to-arginine substitutions in the CH domain (CH-KR) following mock or LLOMe treatment as indicated. Note that CNN2 wild type dissociates from LAMP1 vesicles within 3 h, but the ubiquitylation mutants persist. See Figure S3A for CNN2-GFP 5xKR covering the 5 ubiquitylation sites detected by MS. (E) Quantification of (D). Percentage of LAMP1 vesicles positive for CNN2. More than 20 cells were quantified. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test, *** p = 0.0003 and **** p < 0.0001; ns, not significant. Error bars represent the mean ± SD. (F) Live-cell imaging of HeLa cells expressing CNN2-GFP CH-KR and mCherry-Gal3. Lysosomes were loaded with photosensitizer AIPcS2a, irradiated in the indicated area, and chased over the course of 1 h. See Figure S3E for wild type and CNN2 5xKR imaging data. (A, D, and F) Scale bars, 10 mm.
Rabbit Polyclonal Anti Gal 3, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+goat+gal3+antibody/pmc04408237-74-12-16?v=R%26D+Systems
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit polyclonal anti gal 3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Proteintech mouse anti galectin 3 mab
Figure 2. CNN2 translocates to damaged lysosomes and is ubiquitylated for timely dissociation (A) Dynamic association of endogenous CNN2 with damaged lysosomes in HeLa cells. Immunofluorescence of CNN2 and <t>Gal3</t> as lysosomal damage marker after mock or LLOMe treatment for indicated time periods. Note CNN2 translocation and dissociation before Gal3 clearance. (B) Graph represents the percentage of CNN2 and Gal3-positive vesicles among all Gal3-positive vesicles per cell. More than 30 cells were quantified per condition in each experiment (n = 4 biologically independent experiments). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s multiple comparison test, ** p = 0.0036, *** p = 0.0002, and **** p < 0.0001. Error bars represent the mean ± SEM. (C) Schematic domain structure of CNN2 with positions of identified ubiquitylation sites indicated. CH domain, calponin homology domain; ABS1/2, actin- binding sites. (D) HeLa cells expressing CNN2-GFP wild type or harboring lysine-to-arginine substitutions in the CH domain (CH-KR) following mock or LLOMe treatment as indicated. Note that CNN2 wild type dissociates from LAMP1 vesicles within 3 h, but the ubiquitylation mutants persist. See Figure S3A for CNN2-GFP 5xKR covering the 5 ubiquitylation sites detected by MS. (E) Quantification of (D). Percentage of LAMP1 vesicles positive for CNN2. More than 20 cells were quantified. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test, *** p = 0.0003 and **** p < 0.0001; ns, not significant. Error bars represent the mean ± SD. (F) Live-cell imaging of HeLa cells expressing CNN2-GFP CH-KR and mCherry-Gal3. Lysosomes were loaded with photosensitizer AIPcS2a, irradiated in the indicated area, and chased over the course of 1 h. See Figure S3E for wild type and CNN2 5xKR imaging data. (A, D, and F) Scale bars, 10 mm.
Mouse Anti Galectin 3 Mab, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+goat+gal3+antibody/pm35773250-351-6-19?v=Proteintech
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse anti galectin 3 mab - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

92
Biorbyt anti gal 3 antibodies
Figure 2. CNN2 translocates to damaged lysosomes and is ubiquitylated for timely dissociation (A) Dynamic association of endogenous CNN2 with damaged lysosomes in HeLa cells. Immunofluorescence of CNN2 and <t>Gal3</t> as lysosomal damage marker after mock or LLOMe treatment for indicated time periods. Note CNN2 translocation and dissociation before Gal3 clearance. (B) Graph represents the percentage of CNN2 and Gal3-positive vesicles among all Gal3-positive vesicles per cell. More than 30 cells were quantified per condition in each experiment (n = 4 biologically independent experiments). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s multiple comparison test, ** p = 0.0036, *** p = 0.0002, and **** p < 0.0001. Error bars represent the mean ± SEM. (C) Schematic domain structure of CNN2 with positions of identified ubiquitylation sites indicated. CH domain, calponin homology domain; ABS1/2, actin- binding sites. (D) HeLa cells expressing CNN2-GFP wild type or harboring lysine-to-arginine substitutions in the CH domain (CH-KR) following mock or LLOMe treatment as indicated. Note that CNN2 wild type dissociates from LAMP1 vesicles within 3 h, but the ubiquitylation mutants persist. See Figure S3A for CNN2-GFP 5xKR covering the 5 ubiquitylation sites detected by MS. (E) Quantification of (D). Percentage of LAMP1 vesicles positive for CNN2. More than 20 cells were quantified. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test, *** p = 0.0003 and **** p < 0.0001; ns, not significant. Error bars represent the mean ± SD. (F) Live-cell imaging of HeLa cells expressing CNN2-GFP CH-KR and mCherry-Gal3. Lysosomes were loaded with photosensitizer AIPcS2a, irradiated in the indicated area, and chased over the course of 1 h. See Figure S3E for wild type and CNN2 5xKR imaging data. (A, D, and F) Scale bars, 10 mm.
Anti Gal 3 Antibodies, supplied by Biorbyt, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+goat+gal3+antibody/us10837966-424-0-21?v=Biorbyt
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti gal 3 antibodies - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Novus Biologicals anti galectin 3 gal3 mouse antibody
(A) The expression of MUC16 protein in HCECs separately transduced with two lentiviral-based shRNA vectors (shMUC16-1 or shMUC16-2) were examined through a Western blot analysis. The a-tubulin was used as a loading control. (B) Representative flow cytometric analyses of fluorescence intensity and MUC16 expressions in transduced HCECs followed by fluorescein staining were shown in contour plots. (C) Representative flow cytometric analyses of fluorescence intensity and MUC16 expression in HCECs cultured in KSFM ( left ) or MPM ( right ) followed by fluorescein staining were presented in contour plots. (D) The frozen tissue sections prepared from fluorescein-stained corneal epithelia were stained with <t>GAL3</t> ( red , immunofluorescence), and the cell nuclei were counterstained with DAPI ( blue , immunofluorescence).
Anti Galectin 3 Gal3 Mouse Antibody, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+goat+gal3+antibody/pmc08883176-40-13-19?v=Novus+Biologicals
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti galectin 3 gal3 mouse antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
R&D Systems rat anti gal 3
(A) The expression of MUC16 protein in HCECs separately transduced with two lentiviral-based shRNA vectors (shMUC16-1 or shMUC16-2) were examined through a Western blot analysis. The a-tubulin was used as a loading control. (B) Representative flow cytometric analyses of fluorescence intensity and MUC16 expressions in transduced HCECs followed by fluorescein staining were shown in contour plots. (C) Representative flow cytometric analyses of fluorescence intensity and MUC16 expression in HCECs cultured in KSFM ( left ) or MPM ( right ) followed by fluorescein staining were presented in contour plots. (D) The frozen tissue sections prepared from fluorescein-stained corneal epithelia were stained with <t>GAL3</t> ( red , immunofluorescence), and the cell nuclei were counterstained with DAPI ( blue , immunofluorescence).
Rat Anti Gal 3, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+goat+gal3+antibody/pmc07206130-250-8-11?v=R%26D+Systems
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rat anti gal 3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
R&D Systems biotinylated goat anti galectin 3 gal 3 antibodies
Surface glycosylation of seminal prostasomes: lectin- and immune-transmission electron microscopy. A: Lectin-TEM using SNA. Inserts show enlarged characteristic pattern of SNA-reactivity to each sample group. B: Lectin-TEM using ConA. Inserts show enlarged characteristic pattern of ConA-reactivity to vesicles in each sample group. In O, staining of some proteinaceous material was also observed (arrowheads). C: Immune-TEM using <t>anti-galectin-3</t> antibodies. Inserts show enlarged characteristic pattern of <t>anti-gal-3-reactivity</t> to each sample group. Micrographs show most characteristic patterns obtained. Although differences in the reactivity of particular vesicles could be noticed, it does not affect the general reactivity of the sample (as in IEC when taking all vesicles into account). (N = seminal prostasomes from normozoospermic men; O = seminal prostasomes from oligozoospermic men).
Biotinylated Goat Anti Galectin 3 Gal 3 Antibodies, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+goat+gal3+antibody/pmc06566730-22-11-17?v=R%26D+Systems
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
biotinylated goat anti galectin 3 gal 3 antibodies - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
R&D Systems goat anti gal 3
Surface glycosylation of seminal prostasomes: lectin- and immune-transmission electron microscopy. A: Lectin-TEM using SNA. Inserts show enlarged characteristic pattern of SNA-reactivity to each sample group. B: Lectin-TEM using ConA. Inserts show enlarged characteristic pattern of ConA-reactivity to vesicles in each sample group. In O, staining of some proteinaceous material was also observed (arrowheads). C: Immune-TEM using <t>anti-galectin-3</t> antibodies. Inserts show enlarged characteristic pattern of <t>anti-gal-3-reactivity</t> to each sample group. Micrographs show most characteristic patterns obtained. Although differences in the reactivity of particular vesicles could be noticed, it does not affect the general reactivity of the sample (as in IEC when taking all vesicles into account). (N = seminal prostasomes from normozoospermic men; O = seminal prostasomes from oligozoospermic men).
Goat Anti Gal 3, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+goat+gal3+antibody/10__1523_slash_jneurosci__4983___11__2012-52-8-12?v=R%26D+Systems
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
goat anti gal 3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Becton Dickinson anti-human gal-3 b2c10
Surface glycosylation of seminal prostasomes: lectin- and immune-transmission electron microscopy. A: Lectin-TEM using SNA. Inserts show enlarged characteristic pattern of SNA-reactivity to each sample group. B: Lectin-TEM using ConA. Inserts show enlarged characteristic pattern of ConA-reactivity to vesicles in each sample group. In O, staining of some proteinaceous material was also observed (arrowheads). C: Immune-TEM using <t>anti-galectin-3</t> antibodies. Inserts show enlarged characteristic pattern of <t>anti-gal-3-reactivity</t> to each sample group. Micrographs show most characteristic patterns obtained. Although differences in the reactivity of particular vesicles could be noticed, it does not affect the general reactivity of the sample (as in IEC when taking all vesicles into account). (N = seminal prostasomes from normozoospermic men; O = seminal prostasomes from oligozoospermic men).
Anti Human Gal 3 B2c10, supplied by Becton Dickinson, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+goat+gal3+antibody/pmc04246088-298-0-25?v=Becton+Dickinson
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti-human gal-3 b2c10 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Immunohistochemical staining of Gal-3 (red) expressing microglia. All microglia were detected using the microglia marker Iba1 (green). At 0 DIV no Gal-3-expressing cells were found (A, B). In controls, at 3, 4 and 7 DIV Iba1/Gal-3 co-expressing cells were found and only in the GCL (C, D, G, H, K, and L). LPS-treated retinas displayed larger numbers of Iba1/Gal-3 co-expressing cells that were located in the GCL, INL and OPL at 3, 4 and 7 DIV. Scale bar: 200 μm.

Journal: PLoS ONE

Article Title: Inflamed In Vitro Retina: Cytotoxic Neuroinflammation and Galectin-3 Expression

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161723

Figure Lengend Snippet: Immunohistochemical staining of Gal-3 (red) expressing microglia. All microglia were detected using the microglia marker Iba1 (green). At 0 DIV no Gal-3-expressing cells were found (A, B). In controls, at 3, 4 and 7 DIV Iba1/Gal-3 co-expressing cells were found and only in the GCL (C, D, G, H, K, and L). LPS-treated retinas displayed larger numbers of Iba1/Gal-3 co-expressing cells that were located in the GCL, INL and OPL at 3, 4 and 7 DIV. Scale bar: 200 μm.

Article Snippet: Sections were then incubated with primary antibodies, rabbit anti-glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP, 1:2000, DAKO Cytomation, Glostrup, Denmark), rabbit anti-Iba1 (1:200, WAKO, Tokyo, Japan), rat anti-mouse ED1 (CD68, 1:1000, Nordic Biosite, Täby, Sweden), rat anti-mouse Gal-3 (1:500 WAKO, Tokyo, Japan), mouse anti-NeuN (1:100, Chemicon International, Temecula, CA, USA) or anti-goat Ki67 (1:100, Millipore, Temecula, CA, USA) at 4°C overnight, before subsequent rinsing and incubation in secondary antibodies for 2 h. Secondary antibodies used were Texas Red-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit antibody (1:200; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-rabbit IgG (Molecular Probes, Inc. Eugene, OR, USA) and Alexa Fluor 564 goat anti-rat (Molecular Probes, Inc. Eugene, OR, USA).

Techniques: Immunohistochemical staining, Staining, Expressing, Marker

Quantification of fractions of cells expressing ED1 and Gal-3, respectively, of the total number of Iba1-stained cells. ANOVA analysis was performed for comparison between the LPS-treated group and the control groups. Data are expressed as mean±StDev (n = 3/group) *p<0.05, ***p<0.001.

Journal: PLoS ONE

Article Title: Inflamed In Vitro Retina: Cytotoxic Neuroinflammation and Galectin-3 Expression

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161723

Figure Lengend Snippet: Quantification of fractions of cells expressing ED1 and Gal-3, respectively, of the total number of Iba1-stained cells. ANOVA analysis was performed for comparison between the LPS-treated group and the control groups. Data are expressed as mean±StDev (n = 3/group) *p<0.05, ***p<0.001.

Article Snippet: Sections were then incubated with primary antibodies, rabbit anti-glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP, 1:2000, DAKO Cytomation, Glostrup, Denmark), rabbit anti-Iba1 (1:200, WAKO, Tokyo, Japan), rat anti-mouse ED1 (CD68, 1:1000, Nordic Biosite, Täby, Sweden), rat anti-mouse Gal-3 (1:500 WAKO, Tokyo, Japan), mouse anti-NeuN (1:100, Chemicon International, Temecula, CA, USA) or anti-goat Ki67 (1:100, Millipore, Temecula, CA, USA) at 4°C overnight, before subsequent rinsing and incubation in secondary antibodies for 2 h. Secondary antibodies used were Texas Red-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit antibody (1:200; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-rabbit IgG (Molecular Probes, Inc. Eugene, OR, USA) and Alexa Fluor 564 goat anti-rat (Molecular Probes, Inc. Eugene, OR, USA).

Techniques: Expressing, Staining

Figure 2. CNN2 translocates to damaged lysosomes and is ubiquitylated for timely dissociation (A) Dynamic association of endogenous CNN2 with damaged lysosomes in HeLa cells. Immunofluorescence of CNN2 and Gal3 as lysosomal damage marker after mock or LLOMe treatment for indicated time periods. Note CNN2 translocation and dissociation before Gal3 clearance. (B) Graph represents the percentage of CNN2 and Gal3-positive vesicles among all Gal3-positive vesicles per cell. More than 30 cells were quantified per condition in each experiment (n = 4 biologically independent experiments). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s multiple comparison test, ** p = 0.0036, *** p = 0.0002, and **** p < 0.0001. Error bars represent the mean ± SEM. (C) Schematic domain structure of CNN2 with positions of identified ubiquitylation sites indicated. CH domain, calponin homology domain; ABS1/2, actin- binding sites. (D) HeLa cells expressing CNN2-GFP wild type or harboring lysine-to-arginine substitutions in the CH domain (CH-KR) following mock or LLOMe treatment as indicated. Note that CNN2 wild type dissociates from LAMP1 vesicles within 3 h, but the ubiquitylation mutants persist. See Figure S3A for CNN2-GFP 5xKR covering the 5 ubiquitylation sites detected by MS. (E) Quantification of (D). Percentage of LAMP1 vesicles positive for CNN2. More than 20 cells were quantified. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test, *** p = 0.0003 and **** p < 0.0001; ns, not significant. Error bars represent the mean ± SD. (F) Live-cell imaging of HeLa cells expressing CNN2-GFP CH-KR and mCherry-Gal3. Lysosomes were loaded with photosensitizer AIPcS2a, irradiated in the indicated area, and chased over the course of 1 h. See Figure S3E for wild type and CNN2 5xKR imaging data. (A, D, and F) Scale bars, 10 mm.

Journal: Molecular cell

Article Title: Ubiquitin profiling of lysophagy identifies actin stabilizer CNN2 as a target of VCP/p97 and uncovers a link to HSPB1.

doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2022.06.012

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 2. CNN2 translocates to damaged lysosomes and is ubiquitylated for timely dissociation (A) Dynamic association of endogenous CNN2 with damaged lysosomes in HeLa cells. Immunofluorescence of CNN2 and Gal3 as lysosomal damage marker after mock or LLOMe treatment for indicated time periods. Note CNN2 translocation and dissociation before Gal3 clearance. (B) Graph represents the percentage of CNN2 and Gal3-positive vesicles among all Gal3-positive vesicles per cell. More than 30 cells were quantified per condition in each experiment (n = 4 biologically independent experiments). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s multiple comparison test, ** p = 0.0036, *** p = 0.0002, and **** p < 0.0001. Error bars represent the mean ± SEM. (C) Schematic domain structure of CNN2 with positions of identified ubiquitylation sites indicated. CH domain, calponin homology domain; ABS1/2, actin- binding sites. (D) HeLa cells expressing CNN2-GFP wild type or harboring lysine-to-arginine substitutions in the CH domain (CH-KR) following mock or LLOMe treatment as indicated. Note that CNN2 wild type dissociates from LAMP1 vesicles within 3 h, but the ubiquitylation mutants persist. See Figure S3A for CNN2-GFP 5xKR covering the 5 ubiquitylation sites detected by MS. (E) Quantification of (D). Percentage of LAMP1 vesicles positive for CNN2. More than 20 cells were quantified. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test, *** p = 0.0003 and **** p < 0.0001; ns, not significant. Error bars represent the mean ± SD. (F) Live-cell imaging of HeLa cells expressing CNN2-GFP CH-KR and mCherry-Gal3. Lysosomes were loaded with photosensitizer AIPcS2a, irradiated in the indicated area, and chased over the course of 1 h. See Figure S3E for wild type and CNN2 5xKR imaging data. (A, D, and F) Scale bars, 10 mm.

Article Snippet: REAGENT or RESOURCE SOURCE IDENTIFIER Antibodies Rat monoclonal anti-Gal3 (IF, 1:500) Santa Cruz Biotechnology Cat#sc-23938; RRID:AB_627658 Rabbit monoclonal anti-LAMP1 (IF, 1:500) Cell Signaling Technology Cat#9091; RRID:AB_2687579 Rabbit polyclonal anti-CNN2 (IF, 1:500; WB, 1:1000) Thermo Fischer Scientific Cat#PA5-61878; RRID:AB_2639249 Mouse monoclonal anti-CNN2 (WB, 1:1000) Origene Cat#TA503688; RRID:AB_11124845 Rabbit polyclonal anti-LC3 (IF, 1:500; WB, 1:1000) MBL Cat#PM036; RRID:AB_2274121 Rabbit polyclonal anti-p62 (IF, 1:500; WB, 1:1000) Sigma-Aldrich Cat#P0067; RRID:AB_1841064 Mouse monoclonal anti-p62 (WB, 1:1000) Abnova Cat#A00008878 Mouse monoclonal anti-HSP27 (IF, 1:500) Thermo Fischer Scientific Cat#MA3-015; RRID:AB_325463 Rabbit polyclonal anti-HSP27 (WB, 1:1000) Thermo Fischer Scientific Cat#PA5-78010; RRID:AB_2735924 Rabbit polyclonal anti-TAX1BP1 (WB, 1:1000) Sigma Cat#HPA024432; RRID:AB_1857783 Mouse monoclonal anti-p97 (WB, 1:2000) Santa Cruz Biotechnology Cat#sc-57492; RRID:AB_793927 Mouse monoclonal anti-P4D1 (WB, 1:1000) Cell Signaling Technology Cat#3936; RRID:AB_331292 Mouse monoclonal anti-Tubulin (WB, 1:5000) Sigma-Aldrich Cat#T-5168; RRID:AB_477579 Mouse monoclonal anti-GFP (WB, 1:10000) Roche Cat#11814460001; RRID:AB_390913 horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (WB, 1:10000) Biorad Cat#170-6515; RRID:AB_11125142 horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (WB, 1:10000) Biorad Cat#1706516; RRID:AB_11125547 Alexa Fluor-conjugated goat anti-rabbit, Alexa Fluor 568 (IF, 1:500) Invitrogen Cat#A11011; RRID:AB_143157 Alexa Fluor-conjugated goat anti-rabbit, Alexa Fluor 488 (IF, 1:500) Life technologies Cat#A11034; RRID:AB_2576217 Alexa Fluor-conjugated goat anti-rabbit, Alexa Fluor 633 (IF, 1:500) Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat#A21071; RRID:AB_2535732 Alexa Fluor-conjugated goat anti-mouse, Alexa Fluor 488 (IF, 1:500) Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat#10696113 Alexa Fluor-conjugated goat anti-mouse, Alexa Fluor 594 (IF, 1:500) Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat#A-11032; RRID:AB_2534091 Alexa Fluor-conjugated goat anti-mouse, Alexa Fluor 633 (IF, 1:500) Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat#10246252 Alexa Fluor-conjugated goat anti-rat, Alexa Fluor 488 (IF, 1:500) Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat#A-11006; RRID:AB_2534074 Alexa Fluor-conjugated goat anti-rat, Alexa Fluor 568 (IF, 1:500) Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat#A-11077; RRID:AB_2534121 (Continued on next page) e1 Molecular Cell 82, 2633–2649.e1–e7, July 21, 2022

Techniques: Marker, Translocation Assay, Comparison, Binding Assay, Expressing, Live Cell Imaging, Irradiation, Imaging

Figure 7. p97 and HSPB1 cooperate in removing ubiquitylated CNN2 from lysosomes (A) HSPB1 is trapped on CNN2 in the absence of p97 activity. Proximity biotinylation analyzed by western blot in indicated conditions of lysosome damage (LLOMe) and p97 inhibition (NMS-873). Cells expressing CNN2-APEX2 were treated with LLOMe for 1 h and chased for 2 h after washout prior to the addition of H2O2 to trigger biotinylation. (B) Loss of p97 or HSPB1 function impairs CNN2 dissociation in a non-additive manner. The time course of CNN2 localization to damaged lysosomes upon p97 inhibition (NMS-873), HSPB1 depletion, or a combination of both as indicated. Scale bars, 10 mm. (C) Quantification of (B). The graph represents the percentage of CNN2 and Gal3-positive vesicles among all Gal3-positive vesicles per cell. More than 30 cells were quantified per condition in each experiment (n = 3 biologically independent experiments). Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test, **** p < 0.0001, *** p = 0.0004, * p = 0.0118. Error bars represent the mean ± SEM. (D) HSPB1 acts downstream of ubiquitylation together with p97. HeLa cells stably expressing CNN2-GFP were LLOMe treated for 1 h and chased for 2 h prior to denaturing lysis upon indicated treatments after p97 inhibition (NMS-873), HSPB1 siRNA, or a combination of both as indicated. Ubiquitylation of CNN2 was assessed by western blot after immunoprecipitation using GFP nanobodies. Note that loss of HSPB1, or p97 inhibition, leads to the increased accumulation of ubiquitylated CNN2 after LLOMe-induced damage, but that effects are not additive. (E) Model. After lysosome damage, various resident proteins become ubiquitylated to serve as an anchor point for autophagy-receptor-mediated recruitment of the LC3-decorated phagophore. CNN2 is recruited by associating with the p62 autophagy receptor and then stabilizes actin filaments that assist phagophore formation. CNN2 needs to be subsequently ubiquitylated and removed by p97 with the help of HSPB1 to allow efficient phagophore formation.

Journal: Molecular cell

Article Title: Ubiquitin profiling of lysophagy identifies actin stabilizer CNN2 as a target of VCP/p97 and uncovers a link to HSPB1.

doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2022.06.012

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 7. p97 and HSPB1 cooperate in removing ubiquitylated CNN2 from lysosomes (A) HSPB1 is trapped on CNN2 in the absence of p97 activity. Proximity biotinylation analyzed by western blot in indicated conditions of lysosome damage (LLOMe) and p97 inhibition (NMS-873). Cells expressing CNN2-APEX2 were treated with LLOMe for 1 h and chased for 2 h after washout prior to the addition of H2O2 to trigger biotinylation. (B) Loss of p97 or HSPB1 function impairs CNN2 dissociation in a non-additive manner. The time course of CNN2 localization to damaged lysosomes upon p97 inhibition (NMS-873), HSPB1 depletion, or a combination of both as indicated. Scale bars, 10 mm. (C) Quantification of (B). The graph represents the percentage of CNN2 and Gal3-positive vesicles among all Gal3-positive vesicles per cell. More than 30 cells were quantified per condition in each experiment (n = 3 biologically independent experiments). Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test, **** p < 0.0001, *** p = 0.0004, * p = 0.0118. Error bars represent the mean ± SEM. (D) HSPB1 acts downstream of ubiquitylation together with p97. HeLa cells stably expressing CNN2-GFP were LLOMe treated for 1 h and chased for 2 h prior to denaturing lysis upon indicated treatments after p97 inhibition (NMS-873), HSPB1 siRNA, or a combination of both as indicated. Ubiquitylation of CNN2 was assessed by western blot after immunoprecipitation using GFP nanobodies. Note that loss of HSPB1, or p97 inhibition, leads to the increased accumulation of ubiquitylated CNN2 after LLOMe-induced damage, but that effects are not additive. (E) Model. After lysosome damage, various resident proteins become ubiquitylated to serve as an anchor point for autophagy-receptor-mediated recruitment of the LC3-decorated phagophore. CNN2 is recruited by associating with the p62 autophagy receptor and then stabilizes actin filaments that assist phagophore formation. CNN2 needs to be subsequently ubiquitylated and removed by p97 with the help of HSPB1 to allow efficient phagophore formation.

Article Snippet: REAGENT or RESOURCE SOURCE IDENTIFIER Antibodies Rat monoclonal anti-Gal3 (IF, 1:500) Santa Cruz Biotechnology Cat#sc-23938; RRID:AB_627658 Rabbit monoclonal anti-LAMP1 (IF, 1:500) Cell Signaling Technology Cat#9091; RRID:AB_2687579 Rabbit polyclonal anti-CNN2 (IF, 1:500; WB, 1:1000) Thermo Fischer Scientific Cat#PA5-61878; RRID:AB_2639249 Mouse monoclonal anti-CNN2 (WB, 1:1000) Origene Cat#TA503688; RRID:AB_11124845 Rabbit polyclonal anti-LC3 (IF, 1:500; WB, 1:1000) MBL Cat#PM036; RRID:AB_2274121 Rabbit polyclonal anti-p62 (IF, 1:500; WB, 1:1000) Sigma-Aldrich Cat#P0067; RRID:AB_1841064 Mouse monoclonal anti-p62 (WB, 1:1000) Abnova Cat#A00008878 Mouse monoclonal anti-HSP27 (IF, 1:500) Thermo Fischer Scientific Cat#MA3-015; RRID:AB_325463 Rabbit polyclonal anti-HSP27 (WB, 1:1000) Thermo Fischer Scientific Cat#PA5-78010; RRID:AB_2735924 Rabbit polyclonal anti-TAX1BP1 (WB, 1:1000) Sigma Cat#HPA024432; RRID:AB_1857783 Mouse monoclonal anti-p97 (WB, 1:2000) Santa Cruz Biotechnology Cat#sc-57492; RRID:AB_793927 Mouse monoclonal anti-P4D1 (WB, 1:1000) Cell Signaling Technology Cat#3936; RRID:AB_331292 Mouse monoclonal anti-Tubulin (WB, 1:5000) Sigma-Aldrich Cat#T-5168; RRID:AB_477579 Mouse monoclonal anti-GFP (WB, 1:10000) Roche Cat#11814460001; RRID:AB_390913 horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (WB, 1:10000) Biorad Cat#170-6515; RRID:AB_11125142 horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (WB, 1:10000) Biorad Cat#1706516; RRID:AB_11125547 Alexa Fluor-conjugated goat anti-rabbit, Alexa Fluor 568 (IF, 1:500) Invitrogen Cat#A11011; RRID:AB_143157 Alexa Fluor-conjugated goat anti-rabbit, Alexa Fluor 488 (IF, 1:500) Life technologies Cat#A11034; RRID:AB_2576217 Alexa Fluor-conjugated goat anti-rabbit, Alexa Fluor 633 (IF, 1:500) Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat#A21071; RRID:AB_2535732 Alexa Fluor-conjugated goat anti-mouse, Alexa Fluor 488 (IF, 1:500) Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat#10696113 Alexa Fluor-conjugated goat anti-mouse, Alexa Fluor 594 (IF, 1:500) Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat#A-11032; RRID:AB_2534091 Alexa Fluor-conjugated goat anti-mouse, Alexa Fluor 633 (IF, 1:500) Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat#10246252 Alexa Fluor-conjugated goat anti-rat, Alexa Fluor 488 (IF, 1:500) Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat#A-11006; RRID:AB_2534074 Alexa Fluor-conjugated goat anti-rat, Alexa Fluor 568 (IF, 1:500) Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat#A-11077; RRID:AB_2534121 (Continued on next page) e1 Molecular Cell 82, 2633–2649.e1–e7, July 21, 2022

Techniques: Activity Assay, Western Blot, Inhibition, Expressing, Comparison, Stable Transfection, Lysis, Immunoprecipitation

(A) The expression of MUC16 protein in HCECs separately transduced with two lentiviral-based shRNA vectors (shMUC16-1 or shMUC16-2) were examined through a Western blot analysis. The a-tubulin was used as a loading control. (B) Representative flow cytometric analyses of fluorescence intensity and MUC16 expressions in transduced HCECs followed by fluorescein staining were shown in contour plots. (C) Representative flow cytometric analyses of fluorescence intensity and MUC16 expression in HCECs cultured in KSFM ( left ) or MPM ( right ) followed by fluorescein staining were presented in contour plots. (D) The frozen tissue sections prepared from fluorescein-stained corneal epithelia were stained with GAL3 ( red , immunofluorescence), and the cell nuclei were counterstained with DAPI ( blue , immunofluorescence).

Journal: Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science

Article Title: Transmembrane Mucin 1 Blocks Fluorescein Ingress to Corneal Epithelium

doi: 10.1167/iovs.63.2.31

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) The expression of MUC16 protein in HCECs separately transduced with two lentiviral-based shRNA vectors (shMUC16-1 or shMUC16-2) were examined through a Western blot analysis. The a-tubulin was used as a loading control. (B) Representative flow cytometric analyses of fluorescence intensity and MUC16 expressions in transduced HCECs followed by fluorescein staining were shown in contour plots. (C) Representative flow cytometric analyses of fluorescence intensity and MUC16 expression in HCECs cultured in KSFM ( left ) or MPM ( right ) followed by fluorescein staining were presented in contour plots. (D) The frozen tissue sections prepared from fluorescein-stained corneal epithelia were stained with GAL3 ( red , immunofluorescence), and the cell nuclei were counterstained with DAPI ( blue , immunofluorescence).

Article Snippet: To detect the expression of GAL3, cell suspensions were fixed and incubated with anti-galectin-3 (GAL3) mouse antibody (no. A3A12; Novus Biologicals).

Techniques: Expressing, Transduction, shRNA, Western Blot, Control, Fluorescence, Staining, Cell Culture, Immunofluorescence

Surface glycosylation of seminal prostasomes: lectin- and immune-transmission electron microscopy. A: Lectin-TEM using SNA. Inserts show enlarged characteristic pattern of SNA-reactivity to each sample group. B: Lectin-TEM using ConA. Inserts show enlarged characteristic pattern of ConA-reactivity to vesicles in each sample group. In O, staining of some proteinaceous material was also observed (arrowheads). C: Immune-TEM using anti-galectin-3 antibodies. Inserts show enlarged characteristic pattern of anti-gal-3-reactivity to each sample group. Micrographs show most characteristic patterns obtained. Although differences in the reactivity of particular vesicles could be noticed, it does not affect the general reactivity of the sample (as in IEC when taking all vesicles into account). (N = seminal prostasomes from normozoospermic men; O = seminal prostasomes from oligozoospermic men).

Journal: Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences

Article Title: Surface glycans contribute to differences between seminal prostasomes from normozoospermic and oligozoospermic men

doi: 10.1080/03009734.2019.1592266

Figure Lengend Snippet: Surface glycosylation of seminal prostasomes: lectin- and immune-transmission electron microscopy. A: Lectin-TEM using SNA. Inserts show enlarged characteristic pattern of SNA-reactivity to each sample group. B: Lectin-TEM using ConA. Inserts show enlarged characteristic pattern of ConA-reactivity to vesicles in each sample group. In O, staining of some proteinaceous material was also observed (arrowheads). C: Immune-TEM using anti-galectin-3 antibodies. Inserts show enlarged characteristic pattern of anti-gal-3-reactivity to each sample group. Micrographs show most characteristic patterns obtained. Although differences in the reactivity of particular vesicles could be noticed, it does not affect the general reactivity of the sample (as in IEC when taking all vesicles into account). (N = seminal prostasomes from normozoospermic men; O = seminal prostasomes from oligozoospermic men).

Article Snippet: Monoclonal anti-CD63 antibody (clone TS63) was from Abcam (Cambridge, UK) and biotinylated goat anti-galectin-3 (gal-3) antibodies from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA); 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB), bovine serum albumin (BSA), D-lactose, and methyl- alpha D-mannopyranoside were from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA).

Techniques: Transmission Assay, Electron Microscopy, Staining